DSpace Repository

Inhume, Entomb, Inurn, Immure: Cemeteries and Constructions of Britishness, 1767-1852

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wilson, Kathleen en_US
dc.contributor.author Hoglund, Sarah en_US
dc.contributor.other Department of History en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-22T17:34:48Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-24T14:46:48Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-22T17:34:48Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-24T14:46:48Z
dc.date.issued 2012-05-01
dc.identifier Hoglund_grad.sunysb_0771E_10929 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11401/71277 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1951/59694 en_US
dc.description 202 pg. en_US
dc.description.abstract This dissertation examines the emergence of commercial cemeteries in late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth century Britain, arguing that these spaces of the dead were a key site for the rehearsal of a middle class, British identity. Unlike earlier scholars, who tended to approach the nineteenth century as something like a golden age of burial, hoping to remind the reader of the sacrifices we have made to become thoroughly modern, I have instead attempted to use the cemetery as a way of engaging a series of current issues in the field of nineteenth century studies. Seeking to provide a transcultural, interdisciplinary framing of the early commercial cemetery, I have approached these sites as both empirical and imaginative spaces, presenting them not only as sites, but as idealizing representations of just what it meant to be middle class in Late-Georgian and early-Victorian Britain. To accomplish this, I have analyzed the commercial cemetery, first, in relation to two specific bodies of late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth century literature: urban and public health histories and garden and landscape design treatises. For as much as public health debates may reveal about the anxieties that plagued nineteenth-century Britons - undoubtedly an important part of this story - they ultimately tell us very little about the cemetery's form. As my work demonstrates, the entrepreneurs and promoters behind these new commercial ventures used the language and theoretical underpinnings of the eighteenth century English landscape garden to promote the new burial grounds, surprisingly, as a populist project. Yet the story of burial reform cannot be told without considering Britain's, and Britons', relationship to the country's colonial investment in South Asia. Indeed, one of the central arguments of my dissertation is that imperial examples were central to the development of the cemetery as an integrated aspect of "English" national culture. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree. en_US
dc.format Monograph en_US
dc.format.medium Electronic Resource en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh History--European history--Art history en_US
dc.title Inhume, Entomb, Inurn, Immure: Cemeteries and Constructions of Britishness, 1767-1852 en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.mimetype Application/PDF en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Hinely, Susan en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Barringer, Timothy. en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account