DSpace Repository

Party Identification, Values, Risk Perceptions and Public Opinion on Climate Change

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Huddy, Leonie en_US
dc.contributor.author Sohlberg, Jacob en_US
dc.contributor.other Department of Political Science en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-22T17:35:36Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-24T14:47:28Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-22T17:35:36Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-24T14:47:28Z
dc.date.issued 2011-12-01 en_US
dc.identifier Sohlberg_grad.sunysb_0771E_10729 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1951/59867 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11401/71416 en_US
dc.description 273 pg. en_US
dc.description.abstract While the scientific debate over climate change has been settled, the U.S. public is profoundly divided. Some people view climate change as a huge problem that needs to be resolved, whereas others dismiss it as non-issue. It is vital that we understand what is driving attitudes on this issue since climate change is likely to alter our world in multiple, mostly negative, ways. In this dissertation, I rely on experiments, surveys and content analysis to examine the relative merits of two broad perspectives on what is driving public opinion on climate change. One perspective centers on the role of party elite cues. When party leaders take positions on issues, such as on climate change, they simplify complex information so that ordinary Republicans and Democrats only need to follow their party leaders. The other perspective, the value perspective, is based on the central role of values in shaping political attitudes. Climate change is a multifaceted problem and it can be described as a threat towards multiple values. By experimentally infusing messages with different values, I examine if those who adhere to the target values also react the strongest. The key dependent variables in the studies are climate change policies and risk perceptions. Risks perceptions are important since they influence support for policies. The results show strong support for the party cue perspective, yet only cautious support for the value perspective. A content analysis of news articles published by The New York Times and The Associated Press show that Republican Party leaders are against climate change policies whereas Democratic leaders support them. When party leaders diverge like this, it should lead to a larger gap in the support for climate change policies between the more politically aware Republican and Democratic identifiers compared to the less aware partisans. This is exactly what I find. Moreover, when I experimentally alter party cues, those who identify as Republicans are more persuaded by Republican leaders than by Democratic elites. Democratic leaders, in contrast, are more effective at persuading Democratic identifiers. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree. en_US
dc.format Monograph en_US
dc.format.medium Electronic Resource en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Political Science en_US
dc.subject.other climate change, party identification, public opinion, source cues, values en_US
dc.title Party Identification, Values, Risk Perceptions and Public Opinion on Climate Change en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.mimetype Application/PDF en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Feldman, Stanley en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Lahav, Gallya en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Delli Carpini, Michael X. en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account