DSpace Repository

The Evolution of Size in Fish: Evaluation of Natural Selection for Size and Evidence for a Prolonged Cost of Rapid Growth

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Stephan B. Munch. en_US
dc.contributor.author Perez, Kestrel en_US
dc.contributor.other Department of Marine and Atmospheric Science en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-17T12:21:51Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-24T14:48:28Z
dc.date.available 2012-05-17T12:21:51Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-24T14:48:28Z
dc.date.issued 2011-08-01 en_US
dc.identifier Perez_grad.sunysb_0771E_10573.pdf en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1951/56090 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11401/71670 en_US
dc.description.abstract Having a larger body size tends to be positively associated with fitness, as it often leads to increased survival. For my dissertation I evaluated the strength of natural selection and the presence of prolonged trade-offs from an early period of fast growth in order to better understand the evolution of size. I began by reviewing the literature to assess natural selection pressures for size in the early life history of fishes, and calculated standardized selection differentials. I found that the majority, 77%, of standardized selection differentials were positive indicating that larger size was being favored. Because this literature review only focused on the early life history, I then used the Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia) as my model species to evaluate how selection varies over the life history. Before measuring selection in the field, however, I conducted a lab validation experiment using Atlantic silversides to determine accuracy in otolith back-calculation, a method that can be used to track the traits of survivors. I then collected Atlantic silversides from the field, over their growing season, and found that selection fluctuated considerably between favoring larger size and smaller size. Lastly, I measured a prolonged growth trade-off which has the potential to counteract positive selection for size. Despite evidence for growth costs on some timescales (i. e. immediate, end of life), there has been little evidence of prolonged growth trade-offs which occur in-between these two timescale extremes. I measured 3 traits (swimming ability, muscle morphology, lipid mass) and found that both instantaneous as well as prolonged costs of growth manifested. Interestingly, fish were able to recover their swimming ability after 36-37 days on limited rations. This dissertation has shown that overall selection intensity for size was much weaker when measuring selection over the growing season of Atlantic silversides than when solely looking at the early life history. This result has important implications for better predicting the evolution of size in fish populations due to intense harvesting. Furthermore, I have demonstrated that trade-offs can continue to manifest over a prolonged period and a new life history theory should be developed to take this into account. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree. en_US
dc.format Monograph en_US
dc.format.medium Electronic Resource en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Fisheries and aquatic sciences -- Evolution & development en_US
dc.title The Evolution of Size in Fish: Evaluation of Natural Selection for Size and Evidence for a Prolonged Cost of Rapid Growth en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.mimetype Application/PDF en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Robert M. Cerrato en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember David O. Conover en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Kathryn D. Kavanagh en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Mark G. Meekan. en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account