DSpace Repository

Alternatives For Youth: A Mental Health Perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Richard Morgan. en_US
dc.contributor.author Steinman, Carolyn Anne en_US
dc.contributor.other Department of Social Welfare en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-17T12:22:35Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-24T14:48:34Z
dc.date.available 2012-05-17T12:22:35Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-24T14:48:34Z
dc.date.issued 2011-05-01
dc.identifier Steinman_grad.sunysb_0771E_10434.pdf en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1951/56128 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11401/71703 en_US
dc.description.abstract Since the 1980's, the common practice in handling juvenile justice involved youth in the United States has been with punitive sanctions and institutional placement. The general agreement among policy makers, politicians and juvenile justice professionals is that there is a better way to help these young men and women than with institutional placement or detention. It has been shown that most youth involved in the juvenile justice system can be better served by community based supports grounded in evidence based principles and practices. The purpose of this study was to discover the factors associated with successful outcomes and failures for youth involved in a juvenile justice diversion program in Suffolk County, New York. The subjects in this research project were all participants in the Suffolk County Alternatives For Youth Program during their first year of operation, from October 2005 until October 2006 (573 youth). AFY uses a wraparound approach involving the collaboration and coordination of juvenile justice, child welfare, mental health and other youth service providers to provide short term intensive assessment and intervention services. The objective of this program is to provide at risk youth and families referrals to services and supports needed to prevent involvement in the juvenile justice system. Through examining the juvenile justice outcomes of the AFY participants, 85% (n=486) did not require any additional court involvement or placement up to five years post AFY intake. Of the remaining 87 participants, 71 (12.4%) were deemed a juvenile delinquent and 16 (2.8%) were adjudicated a PINS (status offender) by Suffolk County Family Court. The outcome data also showed that only 1.9% or 11 youth (of 573 AFY participants) were placed in a residential facility, and only 4.9% (28) of the AFY youth received probation (or Juvenile Treatment Court?). en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree. en_US
dc.format Monograph en_US
dc.format.medium Electronic Resource en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Social Work en_US
dc.subject.other Juvenile justice system, Mental Health, PINS diversion, Suffolk County en_US
dc.title Alternatives For Youth: A Mental Health Perspective en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.mimetype Application/PDF en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Shelly Cohen en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Diana Filiano en_US
dc.contributor.committeemember Robert Marmo. en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account