Show simple item record

dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77507
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.en_US
dc.formatMonograph
dc.format.mediumElectronic Resourceen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dc.typeDissertation
dcterms.abstractThis work proposes a critical vocabulary for the study of American historical literature and Native American literature in the light of the genocide of Native America. Considering this genocide in terms of trauma theory (including perpetrator trauma) and relationality theory, it becomes clear that a “working-through†for the non-native postgenerations who have unintentionally inherited stolen lands (along with a self/other construction of non-Native and Native Americans) is ethically and socially desirable. In transcending the dominant self/other paradigm, one’s orientation to US American and Native American historical literature is not about possessing knowledge of these histories and literatures, but rather knowing them in the relational sense, in terms of one’s holistic relation to them in the present. The “white Indian,†a historical or literary figure who has inhabited both EuroAmerican and Native society either symbolically or in reality, is a helpful point of focus in the study of both relational intersubjectivity and narrative strategies used to encourage the forgetting of genocide. Narratives by and about “white Indians†from the seventeenth century up until today can represent and perform various forms and degrees of relationality; they can also represent and perform the forgetting or justification of Native American genocide. Teaching these texts not as “dead letters†but as living messages deserving of an ethical and social response can encourage the working-through necessary to achieve more of a healing intercultural intersubjectivity.
dcterms.available2017-09-20T16:52:50Z
dcterms.contributorNewman, Andrewen_US
dcterms.contributorKaplan, E. Annen_US
dcterms.contributorWelburn, Ron.en_US
dcterms.contributorScheckel, Susanen_US
dcterms.creatorHankinson, Kathleen
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-20T16:52:50Z
dcterms.dateSubmitted2017-09-20T16:52:50Z
dcterms.descriptionDepartment of Englishen_US
dcterms.extent186 pg.en_US
dcterms.formatApplication/PDFen_US
dcterms.formatMonograph
dcterms.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11401/77507
dcterms.issued2016-12-01
dcterms.languageen_US
dcterms.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-09-20T16:52:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Hankinson_grad.sunysb_0771E_12718.pdf: 1040090 bytes, checksum: 3078a2710dc8e7b31e83d70646223d5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 1en
dcterms.publisherThe Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.
dcterms.subjectAmerican historical literature, Early American Literature, Genocide, Native American Literature, Relationality theory, Trauma theory
dcterms.subjectAmerican literature -- Native American studies
dcterms.titleWILLFUL FORGETTING: “WHITE INDIANS,†TRAUMA, AND RELATIONALITY IN AMERICAN HISTORICAL LITERATURE
dcterms.typeDissertation


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record